Electronics IoT Solutions
Many connected-device programs don’t fail in the lab. They fail in the field, months after deployment, when a sensor drifts out of calibration or a firmware gap meets a power brownout nobody tested for. That’s the gap this page is built to close.
Why Fragmented IoT Development Fails in the Field
Almost all connected-device programs don’t fail in engineering. They fail in the gaps between engineering teams.
A hardware team designs a board. A separate firmware house writes the code. A third vendor handles manufacturing. Each one optimizes for their own deliverable: the hardware team hits their spec, the firmware team hits their sprint, the CM hits their yield target, and nobody owns whether the finished device actually survives a Bengaluru rooftop in July or a cold-chain truck at minus twenty.
That’s not a hypothetical. Thermal drift, connector fatigue, and firmware that never accounted for a power brownout are the three most common reasons a working prototype becomes a field failure. Catching them requires the hardware designer, the firmware engineer, and the person running the SMT line to be answerable to the same roadmap.
MicroLOGIX runs PCB design, embedded firmware, wireless integration, prototyping, testing, and manufacturing from one facility. Since 1997, that’s meant one team carries a device from schematic to shipped unit, no handoff where design intent gets lost in translation.
What's Actually in an IoT Build
Embedded hardware
Firmware
Connectivity
Manufacturing
SMT and THT assembly, AOI and X-ray inspection, and functional testing are on the same lines used for MicroLOGIX’s broader EMS work, so a device doesn’t move from a controlled prototype build to an unfamiliar manufacturing partner the moment volume ramps up.
IoT Services Built Around How Each System Actually Fails
IoT for Mobile Infrastructure
IoT for Healthcare
IoT for Industrial Infrastructure
IoT for Building Management System (BMS)
IoT for Logistics Automation
Industries With Additional Requirements
From Concept to Shipped Device
Requirements and architecture
Define the sensing, power, and connectivity requirements against the actual deployment environment, not a lab bench.
PCB design and embedded firmware are developed together, so power budget and code logic are solving the same problem from day one.
Prototyping
Working units are built and stress-tested against the real deployment environment, not validated on a bench alone.
Testing
AOI, X-ray inspection, and functional testing are run on every unit before it ships, not sampled from a batch.
Manufacturing
Pilot builds through volume production run on the same lines, under the same quality system, that built the prototype.
Our Clients










